I’ve noticed recently that the weather announcers have
started reporting predicted temperatures as wind chill figures, in many cases
never predicting actual temperatures. Wind
chill measures are not universal, and their intent is to indicate what the
temperature at the predicted wind speed, minus the assumed speed of the general
movement of the person, would feel like on the exposed skin of a person. While this smacks of subjectivity, there have
been some efforts at instrumental measurement of the factor.
More interesting to me is the media’s apparent need to
report more extreme temperatures than plain old dry bulb air temperatures. This represents just one more case in which
shrill, or hyperbolic presentation, has become more common than calm, or
pacifying, presentation.
Recently I’ve watched a bear try to eat Leonardo DiCaprio in
The Revenant; I’ve watched heads exploded in Thirteen Hours; I’ve listened to
accounts of a machete butcher in Columbus, Ohio; and I’ve watched the political
debates of both parties. No elements of
our media are immune to the tendency to increase the distance between the experiences
of ordinary life and the tone and tenor of their stories. Why is that?
Is the competition for our attention so great that only the
most outrageous have a chance of gaining it?
Are we, in fact, drawn to the most bizarre, heinous, and extreme stories
and reports? Have we become so
indifferent to ordinary stories that we pay them no heed?
No doubt there are those reasons and others that I can’t
imagine. As I write this, days after the sudden death of Supreme Court Justice
Antonin Scalia, the President has announced that he will do as one would expect
him to by making an appointment, and the President of the Senate has done as
one would expect of him announcing his unwillingness to confirm a nominee during an election year. The commentators on all networks and cable
channels are promising a “battle royale,” “a fierce political fire fight,” and
the like over what will simply be another election year stalemate surrounded by
righteous pronouncements on all sides.
One must wonder if the impact of this incessant escalation
of anger, violence, and the extreme in the media that surrounds us day by day plays
some role in the apparent increase in angry, violent, and extreme behavior we
witness more commonly. I’d suggest that
by bringing stories continually framed in the extreme into the common
vernacular the media outlets are major drivers of a growing callousness when
regarding the extremes and increasing inability to reach consensus through
ordinary discussion.
I suspect I’m just showing my age when I long for the days
of Walter Cronkite, and other real journalists, and predicted temperatures
expressed in degrees Fahrenheit or Celsius without the subjective overlays of
wind chill and heat index factors.